CUHCX : Victory US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd Index Fund Class C

CUHCX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend index fund with HIGH fees.

CUHCX

Victory US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd Index Fund Class C

FI Score

22 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CUHCX vs GTHCX

28% FI Score
  • gthcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Invesco Health Care Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs GTASX

28% FI Score
  • gtasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2050 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs EWV

28% FI Score
  • ewv
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs GSP

28% FI Score
  • gsp
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

iPath S&P GSCI Total Return Index ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs TTTN

28% FI Score
  • tttn
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

TigerShares UP Fintech China-U.S. Internet Titans ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs ETCHX

28% FI Score
  • etchx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences Fund CLASS C SHARES

Expenses: 2.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs WWEMX

28% FI Score
  • wwemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Westwood Emerging Markets Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs EMBIX

28% FI Score
  • embix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Blend Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs MGVCX

28% FI Score
  • mgvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MainStay MacKay Infrastructure Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs KORU

28% FI Score
  • koru
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs TSMCX

28% FI Score
  • tsmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Touchstone Dynamic Global Allocation Fund C

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs MWUSX

28% FI Score
  • mwusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Metropolitan West Ultra Short Bond Fund Class M

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs EEICX

28% FI Score
  • eeicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs ECHIX

28% FI Score
  • echix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs ECEOX

28% FI Score
  • eceox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Lazard Emerging Markets Core Equity Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs TASHX

28% FI Score
  • tashx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs TYGGX

28% FI Score
  • tyggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Touchstone International Growth Opportunities Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs DNLAX

28% FI Score
  • dnlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs DRGMX

28% FI Score
  • drgmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

BNY Mellon U.S. Mortgage Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CUHCX vs TPCIX

28% FI Score
  • tpcix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

Timothy Plan Israel Common Values Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo