Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$CTFAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- bmicx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
BlackRock Managed Income Fund Investor C Shares
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- clnax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Columbia Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- tgpnx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
TCW Conservative Allocation Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- hafcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hartford Multi-Asset Income and Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- lagix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Ladenburg Aggressive Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pwtax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
UBS U.S. Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mbesx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AMG GW&K Global Allocation Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- bcapx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ucagx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
USAA Cornerstone Aggressive Fund
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »