CSSPX : Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. Class I

CSSPX is a Sector Equity Market Real Estate with LOW fees.

CSSPX

Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. Class I

FI Score

52 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,678 Sector Equity Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CSSPX vs MFLBX

29% FI Score
  • mflbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

MFS Lifetime 2020 Fund Class B

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs MHFAX

29% FI Score
  • mhfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AXS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs MINC

29% FI Score
  • minc
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AdvisorShares Newfleet Multi-Sector Income ETF

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs EICOX

29% FI Score
  • eicox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs HFZYX

29% FI Score
  • hfzyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs HIPRX

29% FI Score
  • hiprx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Hartford Inflation Plus Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs IAGEX

29% FI Score
  • iagex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Voya Global Equity Dividend Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs PROTX

29% FI Score
  • protx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Probabilities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs ICEWX

29% FI Score
  • icewx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

MainStay Epoch International Choice Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs LZFIX

29% FI Score
  • lzfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Lazard Equity Franchise Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs MCKBX

29% FI Score
  • mckbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs MELIX

29% FI Score
  • melix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Leaders Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs MGGYX

29% FI Score
  • mggyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Mirova Global Green Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs IIRFX

29% FI Score
  • iirfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

Voya Russia Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs TLDAX

29% FI Score
  • tldax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Thornburg Low Duration Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs GTADX

29% FI Score
  • gtadx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2025 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs SBB

29% FI Score
  • sbb
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short SmallCap600

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs NCEAX

29% FI Score
  • nceax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Neuberger Berman Greater China Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs FSGIX

29% FI Score
  • fsgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated U.S. Government Securities Fund 1-3 Years Service Shares

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSSPX vs NIMAX

29% FI Score
  • nimax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo