Diversification Rating
7 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
6 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$CSM Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ryjcx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse Government Long Bond Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 5.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- rgsax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AllianzGI Global Small-Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rifyx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Victory RS Science and Technology Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- rsfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Victory Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ryaqx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse Government Long Bond Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 4.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »
- usoi
- ETF
- Commodities
- Focused
Credit Suisse X-Links Crude Oil Shares Covered Call ETNs
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »
- ryldx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Leveraged Equities
Rydex Dow 2x Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
- rylix
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Consumer Cyclical
Rydex Leisure Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclical Sector Equity fund. See why »
- sasfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AIG Senior Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- stsbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Seix Short-Term Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wccfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Conservative Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- tgnix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
TCW Funds, Inc. - TCW International Small Cap Fund
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- usrax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Horizon Defensive Multi-Factor Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- vmttx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Viking Tax-Free Fund For Montana Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wblnx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Short
William Blair Low Duration Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- wgcfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Growth Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- wtifx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Segall Bryant & Hamill Fundamental Int'l Small Cap Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- aadr
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »