CSFCX : Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. Class C

CSFCX is a Sector Equity Market Real Estate with HIGH fees.

CSFCX

Cohen & Steers Global Realty Shares, Inc. Class C

FI Score

35 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,678 Sector Equity Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CSFCX vs MMDAX

39% FI Score
  • mmdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Madison Moderate Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs FTGOX

39% FI Score
  • ftgox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Salient Tactical Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs RYIPX

39% FI Score
  • ryipx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Royce International Premier Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs MECGX

39% FI Score
  • mecgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Mirae Asset Emerging Markets Great Consumer Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs DSDAX

39% FI Score
  • dsdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Tax Sensitive Total Return Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs DMBZX

39% FI Score
  • dmbzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Opportunistic Municipal Securities Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs MAPIX

39% FI Score
  • mapix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

Matthews Asia Dividend Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs SVIIX

39% FI Score
  • sviix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs MAPCX

39% FI Score
  • mapcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

BlackRock Asian Dragon Fund,Inc.Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs PTWAX

39% FI Score
  • ptwax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

PGIM Jennison 20/20 Focus Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs IPAY

39% FI Score
  • ipay
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs SWMIX

39% FI Score
  • swmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Laudus International MarketMasters Fund™

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs PBW

39% FI Score
  • pbw
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs EMTIX

39% FI Score
  • emtix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Transamerica Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs QEENX

39% FI Score
  • qeenx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AQR Emerging Multi-Style Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs PBPAX

39% FI Score
  • pbpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs PAIIX

39% FI Score
  • paiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

PIMCO Global Bond Opportunities Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs PADAX

39% FI Score
  • padax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs ECTGX

39% FI Score
  • ectgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Growth 1.1 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CSFCX vs QGRCX

39% FI Score
  • qgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo