Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$COGCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- bgiix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Brandes Global Equity Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gtndx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ewecx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Intrinsic World Equity Fund - Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ehgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Hexavest Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- glnax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- apgrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Yorktown Growth Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- cvlcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Calamos Global Growth & Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mecex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- viccx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »