Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$CNRGX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mhoax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MFS Global High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cybax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Calvert High Yield Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- anflx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Angel Oak Financials Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pcmzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Newfleet Low Duration Core Plus Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- shnax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AIG Flexible Credit Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fricx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Floating Rate Strategic Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dticx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Limited-Term Diversified Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- psrwx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Senior Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jedcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »