Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$CIGCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,394 International Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- idhcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Integrity Dividend Harvest Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ignax
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Basic Materials
Ivy Natural Resources Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- aflex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ltfcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Columbia Acorn Select Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ireax
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Real Estate
Ivy LaSalle Global Real Estate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »
- gdgsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund Class S
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- hcmex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
HCM Income Plus Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mdgrx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Basic Materials
BlackRock Natural Resources Trust Investor A Shares
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- glnax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »