Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$CIGCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,394 International Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tinrx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
TIAA-CREF Equity Index Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 0.33% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- vnqi
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Real Estate
Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »
- vwnfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Vanguard Windsor⢠II Fund Investor Share
Expenses: 0.33% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- spmd
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF
Expenses: 0.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- usspx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
USAA 500 Index Fund Member Shares
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- spyd
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
Expenses: 0.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- vbirx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
Expenses: 0.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vwelx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Vanguard Wellington⢠Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- xlv
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund
Expenses: 0.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »