CHIK : Global X MSCI China Information Technology ETF

CHIK is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIK

Global X MSCI China Information Technology ETF

FI Score

36 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIK vs ANGLX

49% FI Score
  • anglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Angel Oak Multi-Strategy Income Fund A Shares

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs NMFAX

49% FI Score
  • nmfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nationwide Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs NPFCX

49% FI Score
  • npfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Funds New Perspective Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs PTAEX

49% FI Score
  • ptaex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Putnam Tax Exempt Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs NUSA

49% FI Score
  • nusa
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Enhanced Yield 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs NWCPX

49% FI Score
  • nwcpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Nationwide Core Plus Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs ASLAX

49% FI Score
  • aslax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs ASMMX

49% FI Score
  • asmmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Invesco Summit Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs OARDX

49% FI Score
  • oardx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Rising Dividends Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIK vs OFVIX

49% FI Score
  • ofvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

O'Shaughnessy Market Leaders Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo