CHIC : Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

CHIC is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIC

Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIC vs SWDSX

46% FI Score
  • swdsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Schwab Dividend Equity Fund™

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs TGDFX

46% FI Score
  • tgdfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

TCW Relative Value Dividend Appreciation Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs TGTRX

46% FI Score
  • tgtrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Templeton Global Total Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs TRDFX

46% FI Score
  • trdfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Crossmark Steward Small-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs TWCAX

46% FI Score
  • twcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

American Century Select Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs TWCCX

46% FI Score
  • twccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

American Century Ultra® Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs VIRAX

46% FI Score
  • virax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement Now Fund Class AX

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs VIXY

46% FI Score
  • vixy
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Volatility

ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Volatility Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs WFICX

46% FI Score
  • wficx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Walthausen Small Cap Value Fund Institutional

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs WFLIX

46% FI Score
  • wflix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Wells Fargo Target 2030 Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs WGBAX

46% FI Score
  • wgbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Growth Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs WHIAX

46% FI Score
  • whiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Ivy High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs WHYIX

46% FI Score
  • whyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Wells Fargo High Yield Municipal Bond Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs WOOPX

46% FI Score
  • woopx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

JPMorgan Intrepid Mid Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs WPOIX

46% FI Score
  • wpoix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Weitz Partners III Opportunity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs XTL

46% FI Score
  • xtl
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

SPDR S&P Telecom ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs YAFFX

46% FI Score
  • yaffx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

AMG Yacktman Focused Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs JIAIX

46% FI Score
  • jiaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multi-Asset High Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs CEMB

46% FI Score
  • cemb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PCFAX

46% FI Score
  • pcfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo