CHIC : Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

CHIC is a International Stocks Market China Stock with MODERATE fees.

CHIC

Global X MSCI China Comm Services ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHIC vs HQBIX

49% FI Score
  • hqbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MCGWX

49% FI Score
  • mcgwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Growth Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MCIYX

49% FI Score
  • mciyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BMO Corporate Income Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MRBBX

49% FI Score
  • mrbbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MFS Total Return Bond Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MSGUX

49% FI Score
  • msgux
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Growth Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MUBFX

49% FI Score
  • mubfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MainStay MAP Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ABRZX

49% FI Score
  • abrzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs MTKIX

49% FI Score
  • mtkix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2060 Series Class I

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs OMECX

49% FI Score
  • omecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

JPMorgan Market Expansion Enhanced Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ALVIX

49% FI Score
  • alvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

American Century Large Company Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ANGLX

49% FI Score
  • anglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Angel Oak Multi-Strategy Income Fund A Shares

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NMFAX

49% FI Score
  • nmfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nationwide Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NPFCX

49% FI Score
  • npfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Funds New Perspective Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs PTAEX

49% FI Score
  • ptaex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Putnam Tax Exempt Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NUSA

49% FI Score
  • nusa
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Enhanced Yield 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs NWCPX

49% FI Score
  • nwcpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Nationwide Core Plus Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ASLAX

49% FI Score
  • aslax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs ASMMX

49% FI Score
  • asmmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Invesco Summit Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs OARDX

49% FI Score
  • oardx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Rising Dividends Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHIC vs OFVIX

49% FI Score
  • ofvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

O'Shaughnessy Market Leaders Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo