CHI : Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund

CHI is a Other Market Other with HIGH fees.

CHI

Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund

FI Score

46 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,461 Other Other funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CHI vs OURAX

16% FI Score
  • ourax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Mission-Auour Risk-Managed Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs APRAX

16% FI Score
  • aprax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

AAM/Phocas Real Estate Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs GGECX

16% FI Score
  • ggecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nationwide Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs APITX

16% FI Score
  • apitx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class L

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs LCDAX

16% FI Score
  • lcdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs PWRIX

16% FI Score
  • pwrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Power Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs RYBHX

16% FI Score
  • rybhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs TSFCX

16% FI Score
  • tsfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Touchstone Small Cap Class C

Expenses: 2.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs GAMDX

16% FI Score
  • gamdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Local Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs CHCGX

16% FI Score
  • chcgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Chesapeake Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs UGPIX

16% FI Score
  • ugpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds UltraChina Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs CFRAX

16% FI Score
  • cfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs MOGLX

16% FI Score
  • moglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Gabelli Media Mogul Fund

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs OCSIX

16% FI Score
  • ocsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Orchard Small Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs ISTAX

16% FI Score
  • istax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

ICON Long/Short Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs CVLFX

16% FI Score
  • cvlfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Cullen Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs LSTOX

16% FI Score
  • lstox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Lazard Global Strategic Equity Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs JSVIX

16% FI Score
  • jsvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

James Alpha Structured Credit Value Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs AFTCX

16% FI Score
  • aftcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2020 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CHI vs RYTIX

16% FI Score
  • rytix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Rydex Technology Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo