Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
We found 11,127 Alternative Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Pacific Funds Large-Cap Value Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
T. Rowe Price Global Consumer Fund
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »
Catalyst Enhanced Core Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
Saratoga Mid Capitalization Portfolio Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
Virtus Horizon Wealth Masters Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
Longboard Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 2.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
Black Oak Emerging Technology Fund
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
QS Global Market Neutral Fund Class I
Expenses: 3.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »
Emerald Insights Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map