Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
7 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$CDHIX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pghy
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- twuax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Century Ultra® Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jhfix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
John Hancock Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- jsmd
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tdhix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica High Yield Bond I
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jhmh
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
John Hancock Multifactor Health Care ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ausf
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
Expenses: 0.27% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- lmcux
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Western Asset California Municipals Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ashhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Century Short Duration Fund I Class
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fyx
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- valq
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Value ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bimfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor USA Index Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- hdgsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
The Hartford Dividend and Growth Fund Class R4
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ousa
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- qsy
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Shareholder Yield Fund
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- hibix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Newfleet Low Duration Core Plus Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- usdy
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Pacific Global US Equity Income ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- nefzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Loomis Sayles Strategic Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- uslix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »