Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$CBON Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tboax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Templeton International Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ncoax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nuveen Symphony High Yield Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- paxhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pax High Yield Bond Fund Individual Investor Class
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- xprtx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Senior Loan Fund Class IB
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rsflx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Victory Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- plcsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pacific Funds Short Duration Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dhhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Diamond Hill High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phsax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO High Yield Spectrum Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pelnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund Class I-3
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »