Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$CBON Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ciocx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Corporate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lroax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BrandywineGLOBAL - Global Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jincx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Unconstrained Debt Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- riocx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Income Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dgccx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Corporate Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bfccx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Funds Corporate Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- psfix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Newfleet Senior Floating Rate Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pxhax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pax High Yield Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- clmcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Mortgage Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »