Diversification Rating
4 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$CACG Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- cpecx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ldvcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Leland Thomson Reuters Venture Capital Index Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- usmcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AlphaSimplex Tactical U.S. Market Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- meifx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Meridian Enhanced Equity Fund® Legacy Class
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pgiex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Putnam Focused Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hsuax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rational Dynamic Brands Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pgivx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Putnam Focused Equity Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tvmax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Guggenheim RBP® Large-Cap Market Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mlsax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Aberdeen Focused U.S. Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »