CACFX : Invesco Greater China Fund Class C

CACFX is a International Stocks Market China Stock with HIGH fees.

CACFX

Invesco Greater China Fund Class C

FI Score

30 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CACFX vs HBYAX

13% FI Score
  • hbyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

HSBC High Yield Fund A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CACFX vs HIPS

13% FI Score
  • hips
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CACFX vs FUE

13% FI Score
  • fue
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

ELEMENTS Linked to the MLCX Biofuels Index (Exchange Series) - Total Return

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare CACFX vs LBHAX

13% FI Score
  • lbhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BrandywineGLOBAL - Global High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CACFX vs MGPIX

13% FI Score
  • mgpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CACFX vs LD

13% FI Score
  • ld
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Bloomberg Lead Subindex Total Return(SM) ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare CACFX vs MLSCX

13% FI Score
  • mlscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Aberdeen Focused U.S. Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CACFX vs MSURX

13% FI Score
  • msurx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare CACFX vs NEOMX

13% FI Score
  • neomx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Neiman Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CACFX vs ABLCX

13% FI Score
  • ablcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo