Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$BXFAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ddfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Global Credit Income Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- atmcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Strategic Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- atpcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Aquila Three Peaks High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- akfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Aberdeen Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eixax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tphax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mfhvx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Mesirow Financial High Yield Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- agccx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AB Unconstrained Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »