BUL : Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF

BUL is a US Stocks Market Large Growth with LOW fees.

BUL

Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF

FI Score

41 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,019 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare BUL vs CIF

38% FI Score
  • cif
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS® Intermediate High Income Fund

Expenses: 2.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs CLFLX

38% FI Score
  • clflx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

AdvisorOne CLS Flexible Income Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs CLMAX

38% FI Score
  • clmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Mortgage Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs CLSCX

38% FI Score
  • clscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs COEAX

38% FI Score
  • coeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Oregon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs PXJ

38% FI Score
  • pxj
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs BNUEX

38% FI Score
  • bnuex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

UBS International Sustainable Equity Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs FEUGX

38% FI Score
  • feugx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Adjustable Rate Securities Fund Service Shares

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs BXFYX

38% FI Score
  • bxfyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings Global Floating Rate Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs EAEMX

38% FI Score
  • eaemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Parametric Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs CSJCX

38% FI Score
  • csjcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs ECHYX

38% FI Score
  • echyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance High-Yield Municipal Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs AHYHX

38% FI Score
  • ahyhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Century High-Yield Fund I Class

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs AIOAX

38% FI Score
  • aioax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Income Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs CHIR

38% FI Score
  • chir
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Real Estate ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs MIEMX

38% FI Score
  • miemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

BMO LGM Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs HOMZ

38% FI Score
  • homz
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

The Hoya Capital Housing ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs GLVNX

38% FI Score
  • glvnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Focus Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs VUSCX

38% FI Score
  • vuscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Quality Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare BUL vs HOLD

38% FI Score
  • hold
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Short

AdvisorShares Sage Core Reserves ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo