Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$BJBHX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jro
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Opportunity Fund
Expenses: 3.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phyix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gilfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund C-Class
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- plhix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pacific Funds High Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dcf
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BNY Mellon Alcentra Global Credit Income 2024 Target Term Fund, Inc.
Expenses: 2.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hwdcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
The Hartford World Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pyewx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund Advisor Class
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- medcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MFS Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- plhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pacific Funds High Income Fund Advisor Class
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »