Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$BISAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,859 International Stocks Mid-Cap Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fstbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Federated Global Allocation Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fstex
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Energy
Invesco Energy Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ftmtx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Franklin Moderate Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- fwsbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
First Western Short Duration Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gcfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Goldman Sachs Core Fixed Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- rsvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
RBC Small Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- segmx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
SEI Daily Income Trust GNMA Fund Class F
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gdat
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Goldman Sachs Data-Driven World ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ggbfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ghqpx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
American Beacon Garcia Hamilton Quality Bond Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- glccx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- gldi
- ETF
- Commodities
- Focused
Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »
- hfhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hwdrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
The Hartford World Bond Fund Class R3
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hwlix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- hygh
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mgvax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
MainStay MacKay Infrastructure Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- ign
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
iShares North American Tech-Multimedia Networking ETF
Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- omsnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Invesco Oppenheimer Main Street All Cap Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »