Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$BIALX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mdgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.Investor A Shares
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lgi
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Total Return and Income Fund Inc
Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- bfit
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Global X Health & Wellness Thematic ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- tincx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Templeton Global Balanced Fund Class A1
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hglb
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Highland Global Allocation Fund
Expenses: 2.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- bsglx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- uswgx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
USAA World Growth Fund Adviser Shares
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- temqx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Franklin Mutual Quest Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- temex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Franklin Mutual Beacon Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »