Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$BGB Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- rpiex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
T. Rowe Price Dynamic Global Bond Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mhyix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hwdyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
The Hartford World Bond Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mwldx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Metropolitan West Low Duration Bond Fund Class M
Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lqdh
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.24% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ohyfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan High Yield Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lemb
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ibdt
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corporate ETF
Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- asbfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Funds Short-Term Bond Fund of America® Class F-1
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »