Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
8 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
8 /10
We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
Hodges Small Intrinsic Value Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
Columbia Maryland Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Arrow DWA Balanced Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
Timothy Aggressive Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
EuroPac International Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Real Estate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
Emerald Insights Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Columbia Georgia Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund
Expenses: 2.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
Franklin LifeSmart⢠2020 Retirement Target Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Innovation Shares NextGen Protocol ETF
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Counterpoint Long-Short Equity Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
AllianzGI High Yield Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
AMG River Road Long-Short Fund Class N
Expenses: 2.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
Nuveen Santa Barbara Global Dividend Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2025 Adam Fortuna
Site Map