Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$AMRCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- aqlgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Alta Quality Growth Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- spfax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth Fund-Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- adsix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Century Disciplined Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ekoax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Omega Growth Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wpasx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AB Concentrated Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryhox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rydex NASDAQ-100® Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- wvalx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Weitz Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryatx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rydex NASDAQ-100® Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- nlagx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Nuveen Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »