Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$AHITX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- crisx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
CRM Small Cap Value Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- eitvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- jhmt
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
John Hancock Multifactor Technology ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- cvfyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Pioneer Disciplined Value Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- cohox
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Coho Relative Value Equity Fund Advisor Class
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ihak
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF
Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- jogix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
JOHCM Global Equity Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- acv
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AllianzGI Diversified Income & Convertible Fund
Expenses: 3.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- chw
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund
Expenses: 3.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »