Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$AGCCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hsdsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Short Duration Fund Class R4
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wdhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo Short-Term High Yield Bond Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- wip
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jigb
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Corporate Bond Research Enhanced ETF
Expenses: 0.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- accbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Corporate Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fltb
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.36% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- stwlx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Schroder Long Duration Investment-Grade Bond Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rpibx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mghyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Global High Income Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »