AEMSX : Aberdeen Emerging Markets Fund Institutional Service Class

AEMSX is a International Stocks Market Emerging Markets with MODERATE fees.

AEMSX

Aberdeen Emerging Markets Fund Institutional Service Class

FI Score

53 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Emerging Markets funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare AEMSX vs ETAGX

41% FI Score
  • etagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Eventide Gilead Class A

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs GAXCX

41% FI Score
  • gaxcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Goldman Sachs Dynamic Global Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs AAAIX

41% FI Score
  • aaaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Century Strategic Allocation: Aggressive Fund I Class

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs ARKW

41% FI Score
  • arkw
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

ARK Next Generation Internet ETF

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs RYAIX

41% FI Score
  • ryaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100® Strategy Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs FIFGX

41% FI Score
  • fifgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Fidelity SAI Inflation-Focused Fund

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs QGTA

41% FI Score
  • qgta
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

IQ Leaders GTAA Tracker ETF

Expenses: 0.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs MTOKX

41% FI Score
  • mtokx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2025 Series Class K

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs INIYX

41% FI Score
  • iniyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

VanEck International Investors Gold Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs RWW

41% FI Score
  • rww
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

Invesco S&P Financials Revenue ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs KDFI

41% FI Score
  • kdfi
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

KFA Dynamic Fixed Income ETF

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs FAN

41% FI Score
  • fan
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF

Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs HYHG

41% FI Score
  • hyhg
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

ProShares High Yield—Interest Rate Hedged

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs JOELX

41% FI Score
  • joelx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

JPMorgan Opportunistic Equity Long/Short Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs CSA

41% FI Score
  • csa
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

VictoryShares US Small Cap Volatility Wtd ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs SISIX

41% FI Score
  • sisix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Virtus Seix Investment Grade Tax-Exempt Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs GSCGX

41% FI Score
  • gscgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Capital Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs JGVAX

41% FI Score
  • jgvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Global Value Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs FHAOX

41% FI Score
  • fhaox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® Blend 2055 Fund

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AEMSX vs MGAFX

41% FI Score
  • mgafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo