ACSI : American Customer Satisfaction ETF

ACSI is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with MODERATE fees.

ACSI

American Customer Satisfaction ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ACSI vs NPFCX

49% FI Score
  • npfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Funds New Perspective Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs HFYSX

49% FI Score
  • hfysx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs NUSA

49% FI Score
  • nusa
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Enhanced Yield 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs UAGNX

49% FI Score
  • uagnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

USAA Government Securities Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs NWCPX

49% FI Score
  • nwcpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Nationwide Core Plus Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs HLEMX

49% FI Score
  • hlemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Portfolio Advisor Class

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs JO

49% FI Score
  • jo
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

iPath Series B Bloomberg Coffee Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs OGBCX

49% FI Score
  • ogbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

JPMorgan Investor Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs OGINX

49% FI Score
  • oginx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Opportunities Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs PABAX

49% FI Score
  • pabax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs USCRX

49% FI Score
  • uscrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

USAA Cornerstone Moderately Aggressive Fund

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs OCGCX

49% FI Score
  • ocgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

JPMorgan Investor Conservative Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs OPSIX

49% FI Score
  • opsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs ABRZX

49% FI Score
  • abrzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs ANGLX

49% FI Score
  • anglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Angel Oak Multi-Strategy Income Fund A Shares

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs ASLAX

49% FI Score
  • aslax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs AUGAX

49% FI Score
  • augax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Columbia Quality Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs BALCX

49% FI Score
  • balcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs OSMNX

49% FI Score
  • osmnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Invesco Oppenheimer International Small-Mid Company Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ACSI vs BBNTX

49% FI Score
  • bbntx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo