Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$ACFSX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- rylgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tvdax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Guggenheim RBP® Large-Cap Defensive Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tvfmx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Guggenheim RBP® Large-Cap Market Fund Class P
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- tvmax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Guggenheim RBP® Large-Cap Market Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mlsax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Aberdeen Focused U.S. Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- insax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Catalyst Insider Buying Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryawx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund Class H
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hotfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
FundX Aggressive Upgrader Fund
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mfgix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Monteagle Quality Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »