Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$ACEVX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,471 International Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- sibpx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tgcix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Timothy Plan Growth & Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- brucx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
Brookfield U.S. Listed Real Estate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- lpdix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2060 Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- lpdax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2060 Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 2.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- leqcx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
LoCorr Dynamic Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 3.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- oepix
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Energy
Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund Investor Class
Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »
- srecx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Real Estate
PGIM Select Real Estate Fund- Class C
Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »
- padix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Pacific Advisors Income and Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 4.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »