Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$ACAAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- miln
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Global X Millennials Thematic ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- legax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Columbia Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pmom
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Principal Sustainable Momentum Index ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- cacg
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
ClearBridge All Cap Growth ETF
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- klgix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
MainStay MacKay Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hgosx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
The Hartford Growth Opportunities Fund Class R4
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jbgax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- lead
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Reality Shares Divcon Leaders Dividend ETF
Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- gqeix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »