Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$AACFX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- iclex
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Consumer Defensive
ICON Consumer Staples Fund Class S
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ihicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Emerging Market Debt Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- kircx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Real Estate
Salient Global Real Estate Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »
- osfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Plus Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- paabx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Pacific Advisors Fund Inc. - Balanced Fund
Expenses: 6.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pamvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Pacific Advisors Mid Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 6.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ogycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco High Yield Bond Factor Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Global High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dchf
- ETF
- Money Market
- World
Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long USD vs. CHF Index
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »