AACFX : Invesco Greater China Fund Class A

AACFX is a International Stocks Market China Stock with HIGH fees.

AACFX

Invesco Greater China Fund Class A

FI Score

34 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare AACFX vs RYMDX

17% FI Score
  • rymdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs EIXIX

17% FI Score
  • eixix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs ETABX

17% FI Score
  • etabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eventide Limited-Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs ETCDX

17% FI Score
  • etcdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs ETCMX

17% FI Score
  • etcmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs PGYCX

17% FI Score
  • pgycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pioneer Global High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs OVECX

17% FI Score
  • ovecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Sterling Capital Mid Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs GCLLX

16% FI Score
  • gcllx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Flexible Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs UGPIX

16% FI Score
  • ugpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds UltraChina Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs GLNBX

16% FI Score
  • glnbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs GLNCX

16% FI Score
  • glncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs JMNSX

16% FI Score
  • jmnsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

JPMorgan Research Market Neutral Fund Class I

Expenses: 3.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs RJN

16% FI Score
  • rjn
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

ELEMENTS Linked to the Rogers International Commodity Index - Energy Total Return

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs PJDCX

16% FI Score
  • pjdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs PWRIX

16% FI Score
  • pwrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Power Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs TSFCX

16% FI Score
  • tsfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Touchstone Small Cap Class C

Expenses: 2.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs PUDBX

16% FI Score
  • pudbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PGIM Real Assets Fund- Class B

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs RYBHX

16% FI Score
  • rybhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs SEGIX

16% FI Score
  • segix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare AACFX vs UNWPX

16% FI Score
  • unwpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

U.S. Global Investors World Precious Minerals Fund

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo