AABFX : Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund Class A

AABFX is a Allocation Market All-In-One with HIGH fees.

AABFX

Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund Class A

FI Score

32 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,682 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare AABFX vs DGQAX

  • dgqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AmericaFirst Defensive Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 3.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs EKAR

  • ekar
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

Ideanomics Shares NextGen Vhcl andTchETF

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs SFPAX

  • sfpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Saratoga Financial Service Portfolio Fund Class A

Expenses: 3.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs LEOOX

  • leoox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard Enhanced Opportunities Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 2.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs RYMAX

  • rymax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Rydex Telecommunications Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs SFPIX

  • sfpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Saratoga Financial Service Portfolio Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 3.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs UKPSX

  • ukpsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds UltraShort Japan Fund Service Class

Expenses: 2.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs SHPAX

  • shpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Saratoga Health & Biotechnology Portfolio Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs ASARX

  • asarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Asset Management Fund Ultra Short Mortgage Fund

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs RYCRX

  • rycrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Rydex Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs FDPIX

  • fdpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Money Market
  • World

ProFunds Falling U.S. Dollar Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs SHPCX

  • shpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Saratoga Health & Biotechnology Portfolio Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs UNPSX

  • unpsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Ultra International Fund Service Class

Expenses: 3.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs RYMJX

  • rymjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Rydex Commodities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs TMPFX

  • tmpfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund

Expenses: 100.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs RYRCX

  • ryrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclical

Rydex Retailing Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclical Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs SBMBX

  • sbmbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Portfolio Fund Class A

Expenses: 3.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs SEPCX

  • sepcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials Portfolio Fund Class C

Expenses: 4.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs PDFDX

  • pdfdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Perkins Discovery Fund

Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare AABFX vs DGQUX

  • dgqux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AmericaFirst Defensive Growth Fund Class U

Expenses: 3.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo