All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- ecamx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- nffcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nuveen Symphony Floating Rate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nngcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Nuveen Large-Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fbtdx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- pwbcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Virtus Rampart Sector Trend Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ldvax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Leland Thomson Reuters Venture Capital Index Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ncfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nuveen Symphony High Yield Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rfxix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Rational Special Situations Income Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- wagtx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Seven Canyons World Innovators Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »