All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- jclcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- jdd
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Nuveen Diversified Dividend and Income Fund
Expenses: 2.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jogix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
JOHCM Global Equity Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jri
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund
Expenses: 2.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jttcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2020 Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- maegx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BlackRock Long-Horizon Equity Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mbaax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Global Strategist Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mtpkx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Manning & Napier Target 2030 Series Class K
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- oargx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Oakmark Global Fund Service Class
Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »