All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- bciix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Brown Capital Management International Equity Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- bfonx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Biondo Focus Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- gcgcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Goldman Sachs Concentrated Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- insix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Catalyst Insider Buying Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jlgax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
JAG Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jpfcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
JPMorgan Equity Focus Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mpgex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Meritage Growth Equity Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- nbncx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Neuberger Berman International Select Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- pinwx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Putnam International Growth Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »