All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- cvfcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Pioneer Disciplined Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- degix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Delaware International Value Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- eplbx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
MainStay Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- eplkx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
MainStay Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- higcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Carillon Eagle Growth & Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- idivx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Integrity Dividend Harvest Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ivfcx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Federated International Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- kcvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value Fund I Class
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- mhiex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Miller/Howard Income-Equity Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »