All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- usmcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AlphaSimplex Tactical U.S. Market Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- usmax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AlphaSimplex Tactical U.S. Market Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dayfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AlphaSimplex Multi-Asset Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dacfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AlphaSimplex Multi-Asset Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- asfyx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Future
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
- asfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Future
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
- amfax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Future
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
- smcp
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- alfa
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
AlphaClone Alternative Alpha ETF
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- gnxix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gnxax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- iofix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- iofcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- iofax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- vmot
- ETF
- Alternatives
- Short
Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF
Expenses: 2.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- qval
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- qmom
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ival
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- imom
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »