All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- ihak
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF
Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- imrfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Columbia Global Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ipoax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Ivy Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- irbo
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF
Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- isds
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Invesco RAFI Strategic Developed ex-US Small Company ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- jclcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- jcmax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jdd
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Nuveen Diversified Dividend and Income Fund
Expenses: 2.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jdscx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
JPMorgan Small Cap Blend Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »