All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- pksax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- pkrsx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Invesco Peak Retirement 2050 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- pkrax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Invesco Peak Retirement 2065 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- pkcbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund Advisor Class
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pkbix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund SI Class
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pkb
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Consumer Cyclicals
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »
- pjrcx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
PGIM QMA International Equity Fund- Class C
Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- pjrbx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
PGIM QMA International Equity Fund- Class B
Expenses: 2.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- pjrax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
PGIM QMA International Equity Fund- Class A
Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »