All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- jptbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® Blend 2055 Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- jpus
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jpvix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Janus Henderson Value Plus Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- jpvtx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Janus Henderson Value Plus Income Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- jqc
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund
Expenses: 3.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jqua
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jraix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jrbex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® Blend 2030 Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- jrbfx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Financial Services
John Hancock Regional Bank Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »
- jrbsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jri
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund
Expenses: 2.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jrmtx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Janus Henderson International Managed Volatility Fund Class T
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- jro
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Opportunity Fund
Expenses: 3.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jrs
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund
Expenses: 2.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- jrsix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Janus Henderson U.S. Managed Volatility Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jrstx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Janus Henderson U.S. Managed Volatility Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jrsvx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Neutral
James Alpha Relative Value Portfolio Class S Shares
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »
- jsaax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2045 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- jsacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2045 Fund Class C
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »