All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- lstox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Strategic Equity Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lstix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Strategic Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lsst
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lsrix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Emerald Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lsqcx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Invesco Long/Short Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- lsqax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Invesco Long/Short Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- lspix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
LoCorr Spectrum Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- lspcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
LoCorr Spectrum Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- lspax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
LoCorr Spectrum Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- lsmcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Columbia Disciplined Small Core Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lsmax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Columbia Disciplined Small Core Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lsltx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Leuthold Select Industries Fund
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lsiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- lshcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund Advisor Class C
Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- lshax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund Advisor Class A
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- lsgsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lsgrx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Loomis Sayles Growth Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- lsglx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lsggx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »