All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- artgx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Artisan Global Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- artmx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Artisan Mid Cap Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- asvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
American Century Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- awf
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund Inc.
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- baeix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Sterling Capital Equity Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bagax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund Advisor Shares
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- basfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BMO Short Tax-Free Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- biaux
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- biiex
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Brandes International Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- bopix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Sterling Capital Special Opportunities Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- bscfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Baron Small Cap Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- cmdy
- ETF
- Commodities
- Broad
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Broad Commodity ETF
Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
- coavx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Columbia Overseas Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- coiax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Short
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Conservative Income Fund Class F
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- cpoax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Morgan Stanley Insight Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- craix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
CRA Qualified Investment CRA Shares
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- crak
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Energy
VanEck Vectors Oil Refiners ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »
- cseix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Real Estate
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. Class A
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »
- cxhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Delaware National High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »