All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- mffrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- mlnix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Concentrated Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nqgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Nuveen NWQ Global Equity Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- piptx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pobcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pqicx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rlgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income Class C
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rricx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Global Equity
Columbia Global Infrastructure Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »
- ssiax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »