All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- aabcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- imolx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Transamerica Asset Allocation Moderate Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ittsx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hartford Multi-Asset Income and Growth Fund Class R4
Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mmdax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Madison Moderate Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mnhix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Maximum Term Series Class I
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ncdmx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Nationwide Investor Destinations Moderate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pabbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- paebx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- paecx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »