All Funds
We found 11,570 funds for you. Want help finding the best ones? Check out the Minafi Investor Bootcamp.
- ebsax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Future
Equinox Campbell Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
- pinwx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Putnam International Growth Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- cpecx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- gigcx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
Aberdeen International Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- nwucx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Nationwide U.S. Small Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- arytx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Real Estate
American Century Global Real Estate Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »
- ngrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Real Estate
Neuberger Berman Global Real Estate Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »
- nlsax
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund Class A
Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- tdmtx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Templeton Developing Markets Trust Class C
Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »